Community reports
Users report preparation practices and safety experiences.
Glunie Index
A transparent safety score, built by the community.
The Glunie Index helps you understand how safe a place may be - based on real experiences.
Based on consistent community reports and a limited number of risk indicators.
0/ 100
High safety rating
Reported SafeHigh Confidence
How the score is built
How we calculate the score
The Glunie Index combines real community reports with signals that raise or lower confidence in a place. It is designed to show how the score is formed, not to hide uncertainty behind a single number.
Risk indicators
Shared fryers, cross-contact, or symptom evidence weigh more heavily.
Confidence
More consistent reports increase stability and reliability.
Confidence levels
Confidence shows how stable the score is - based on the volume and consistency of reports.
Low
less data
Medium
mixed
High
consistent
High confidence
Reports are consistent and repeatable, so the score is more stable.
- Many aligned reports
- Low risk in reported signals
- The score fluctuates less often
Note: venue practices can change - it is always worth confirming on-site.
What the numbers mean
Labels reflect typical interpretation. Strong risk evidence may lower the classification.
Transparency
Limitations & transparency
The score is useful when paired with context. We show what strengthens confidence, where uncertainty remains, and what the score cannot claim.
Limitations
- Limited reports increase uncertainty
- Venue practices can change
- This is not a medical certification
Health context
Glunie is informational support, not medical advice
Glunie helps people understand venue-reported practices and community experiences, but it does not diagnose celiac disease, assess your personal medical risk, or replace advice from your doctor or dietitian.
If you have celiac disease or another medical condition, use this score alongside direct confirmation from the venue and guidance from your clinician.
Sources
Reference organizations we use to shape the methodology
The score is community-led, but the way we explain risk, cross-contact, and verification is informed by established celiac organizations.
Celiac Disease Foundation
Dining and social eating guidance, including cross-contact questions to ask before ordering.
Celiac Disease Foundation
Treatment and follow-up guidance showing why diagnosis and ongoing care should stay with a clinician and experienced dietitian.
Coeliac UK
Eating out guidance covering planning ahead, checking fryer and prep practices, and confirming procedures directly with staff.
Philosophy
We show score, confidence, and limitations together. The goal is clarity, not false certainty.
Help improve this score
Community reports strengthen accuracy and confidence.
Your experience can help someone avoid unnecessary risk.